Quote from: eivhelle on October 20, 2010, 18:31:39 PM
Hadde han snakket varmt om sin egne fortreffelighet hadde det vært en annen sak.

Det har han vel allerede gjort til gagns i BT forrige helg...

Quote from: Ferguson on July 31, 2009, 14:11:18 PM
Liverød har ikke agentlisens!

Her er listen over alle norske agenter:

http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federation/administration/playersagents/association=nor.html

Vel, det er en sannhet med modifikasjoner. Liverød har agentlisens gjennom det uruguayanske fotballforbundet:

http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federation/administration/playersagents/association=uru.html

Dette overskygger likevel ikke for det faktum at han er en fotballhallik av verste sort.

Spørs om ikke Møllar'en-sekvensen må omskrives til:

"Vi kan krype hem fra Foten,
med kroppen full av sprit.
Men vi stiller når det gjelder,
selv om laget stinker drit."

Finn Harps-Derry City er litt som om Sogndal (Finn Harps) skulle møte Brann (Derry City) hjemme på Fosshaugane (Ballybofey).

Ser at Kristian Jæger er bokaktuell med "Mein kampfprodukt". Ifølge det tyske forlaget, er dette den første New Public Management-influerte fotballboken på markedet. Hovedkonklusjonen er visstnok at to Bjørn Dahl er én for mye, og at sluttpakker kan være et effektivt virkemiddel for å unngå slike duplikasjoner.

Eventuelt at han lar seg impalere av et frossent Brannbrød, som et ledd i pauseunderholdningen på stadion den 16.

Vurderer å ta med meg kommentarutgaven av Kjøpsloven på neste hjemmekamp. Som et alternativ til skjerf, selvsagt. På tide å ta konsekvensen av at sportsklubben (sic!) har definert meg som kunde og ikke tilhenger. Flere enn meg som reagerte på at Erik Hanøy etterlyste "Terje Bøe" over høyttaleranlegget på søndag? Et rop om hjelp? En indikasjon på at produsenten er begynt å tvile på sitt eget produkt?

Det produktet vi ble lovet, "Nordens beste kampfprodukt", holder i massevis for meg.

Som vi har sett den siste tiden: Produktet er defekt. Har Bataljonen, som det organiserte uttrykket for Branns kundemasse, planer om å bringe denne informasjonen videre til Forbrukerombudet?

The fact you would have beaten us with 10 men anyway, is an entirely different matter, though;)

Not at all. I rate Everton as one of the top three sides left in the competition. I'd be very surprised if the trophy didn't go to Germany (Bayern or Hamburg) or England (Everton, possibly Tottenham). Everton's 8-1 aggregate win doesn't really reflect the tie very well, which I think (from the post-match interviews) most of the Everton players and staff realised. Also, crucial decisions went aganist Brann throughout, and having seen the Carsley-Demba Nyren incident in replay, I am appalled the referee failed to penalise the Everton midfielder.

Even if one cannot excuse a 1-8 aggregate defeat, It's confusing stuff to read the match reports from last evening's game. According to British newspaper Guardian, for example, Everton had 10 shots on target yesterday, which now means that they have scored 8 goals from 14 shots on target overall in this tie. The conclusions to be drawn then is that Everton either have a couple of very good strikers or that they have been exceptionally effective in front of goal in these matches. To compare, in the Premiership this season they have scored 41 goals from 116 shots on target, which gives a shots on target/goals ration of almost 3. To compare, over the two legs against Brann, this ratio is 1,75. To sum up, Everton deservedly through, but courtesy of a ridiculously flattering aggregate score. Cahill would do well to follow the example of the Everton players, who appears to take a prosaic view on this route into the last 16. The alternative, I reckon, is a brutal reality check in Florence.

The free-kick was debatable, which is also why we should accept that the referee didn't give it, and certainly from the ref's position it did look innocuous. The offside though, was unbelievable. The linesman was on line with Anichebe yet he failed to raise his flag, which doesn't do much to eliminate my prejudices against match officials from Eastern Europe. Also I don't think we should drop to the level of the Everton forums, where some of us Brann lads were banned because our definition of "friendly banter" didn't suit the pompous moderators.

Hvis Lerkendal skal legge listen, så kan jo Brann like gjerne relokalisere til sørsiden av Møllendalsveien med en gang.

Another well put match report from the Independent:

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/sk-brann-0-everton-2-anichebe-adds-gloss-as-everton-ride-luck-782110.html

Regarding the first goal, it looked a clear cut free-kick from the Hansa end, but  from the referee's position the challenge on Eldar Vaagan appeared a bit more innocuous. The linesman should have flagged, though.

Couldn't give a toss about what BBC says about the game. After all, we are talking about a vital component of the British propaganda machinery here. The Guardian has a proper peace on the game, though, even if they fail to mention that Everton's second goal should have been ruled out for offside:

http://football.guardian.co.uk/Match_Report/0,,2256270,00.html

"He's got tourettes, he's got tourettes,
he used to play for New York Mets"

Disappointed with Everton, and I have a sneaking feeling the scoreline would have been reversed if we had been in the middle of our season, not vice versa. This is actually looking quite good with regards to our next European campaign starting this summer. I think both Brügge and HSV put us under more pressure than Everton did, and the scousers will find it difficult to progress much further in this competition. Their back-four did look rock-solid, though, with Yobo and Jagielka the pick of the bunch.

It's always an embarrassment to read posts from Brann fans desperate to talk their side up in the run-up to European fixtures, safe in the knowledge that we are possibly the worst side left in the competition (only Helsingborgs IF and Rosenborg look poorer in my book). It must be some really bad aquavita out there these days... Credit to the Evertonians on this post for having the politeness, not to mention the resilience, to even treat us as a serious contender in this tie. I do agree that Hamburg are as good as Everton, but we were not anywhere near beating them in our own ground. As for Rennes, to equate them with Everton is an insult to our English guests on this forum.

Her er for øvrig lenke til seedingsgruppene for trekningen i morgen. Brann kan fort havne i en esselett gruppe, og ironisk nok virker seedingsgruppe 3 som den sterkeste:

http://www.xs4all.nl/~kassiesa/bert/uefa/seeduc2007.html

Tilskuersnittene er interessante, selv om AIK og FCK i motsetning til Brann og RBK drar fordel av byderbier, som trekker snittet kraftig opp. Nå er det vel slik at av de fire lagene som topper denne oversikten, så opererer Brann med den i særklasse høyeste snittprisen per billett (vet for eksempel at det er en forholdsvis billig affære å se FCK i Idrættsparken og RBK hiver jo gratisbilletter etter trønderpakket). Skulle ikke forundre meg om Brann er den klubben i Skandinavia som har de høyeste billettinntektene. Noen som vet noe mer om dette?